Redox equilibria

Every battery in your phone or car is a pair of redox half-reactions kept apart so that the electrons must travel through a wire. This topic shows how standard electrode potentials measure the pull of each half-reaction for electrons, how they predict which reactions can happen, and how redox titrations put oxidation and reduction to work in quantitative analysis.

Electrochemical cells

A half-cell is an element in two oxidation states in contact with each other, such as a strip of zinc dipping into a solution of zinc ions. Each half-cell sets up its own equilibrium, with the reduced form on the right by convention:

Zn2+(aq) + 2e− ⇌ Zn(s)      Cu2+(aq) + 2e− ⇌ Cu(s)

Zinc has a greater tendency than copper to lose electrons and form ions, so more electrons build up on the zinc strip. Join the two half-cells and there is a potential difference between them: the zinc is the negative electrode and the copper the positive one. For standard Zn and Cu half-cells it is 1.10 V.

Cell diagrams

A cell is written in shorthand, with a single vertical line for a boundary between phases and a double line for the salt bridge. The oxidised forms are written next to the salt bridge, and by convention the positive electrode is on the right:

Zn(s) | Zn2+(aq) || Cu2+(aq) | Cu(s)    Ecell = +1.10 V

Standard electrode potentials

You cannot measure the potential of one half-cell on its own, only the difference between two. So every half-cell is measured against the same reference, the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), whose potential is defined as exactly 0 V:

Pt | H2(g) | H+(aq)     2H+(aq) + 2e− ⇌ H2(g)

Half-equationE⦵ / V
Li+(aq) + e− ⇌ Li(s)−3.03
Mg2+(aq) + 2e− ⇌ Mg(s)−2.37
Zn2+(aq) + 2e− ⇌ Zn(s)−0.76
Fe2+(aq) + 2e− ⇌ Fe(s)−0.44
Ni2+(aq) + 2e− ⇌ Ni(s)−0.25
2H+(aq) + 2e− ⇌ H2(g)0.00
Cu2+(aq) + 2e− ⇌ Cu(s)+0.34
I2(aq) + 2e− ⇌ 2I−(aq)+0.54
Fe3+(aq) + e− ⇌ Fe2+(aq)+0.77
Ag+(aq) + e− ⇌ Ag(s)+0.80
Br2(aq) + 2e− ⇌ 2Br−(aq)+1.09
O2(g) + 4H+(aq) + 4e− ⇌ 2H2O(l)+1.23
Cl2(aq) + 2e− ⇌ 2Cl−(aq)+1.36
MnO4−(aq) + 8H+(aq) + 5e− ⇌ Mn2+(aq) + 4H2O(l)+1.51
F2(g) + 2e− ⇌ 2F−(aq)+2.87

The more negative E⦵, the more readily the right-hand species loses electrons: the strongest reducing agents (Li, Mg) are at the top right. The more positive E⦵, the more readily the left-hand species gains electrons: the strongest oxidising agents (F2, MnO4−) are at the bottom left.

Cell e.m.f. and feasibility

\[ E^{\ominus}_{\text{cell}} = E^{\ominus}_{\text{right}} - E^{\ominus}_{\text{left}} = E^{\ominus}_{\text{reduced}} - E^{\ominus}_{\text{oxidised}} \]

In a working cell, the half-cell with the more positive E⦵ goes forwards (reduction) and the one with the more negative E⦵ goes backwards (oxidation). A reaction is feasible (thermodynamically possible) when E⦵cell for it is positive.

Ni2+/Ni is −0.25 V and Ag+/Ag is +0.80 V. Silver is more positive, so Ag+ is reduced and nickel is oxidised.

E⦵cell = +0.80 − (−0.25) = +1.05 V. Cell diagram: Ni(s) | Ni2+(aq) || Ag+(aq) | Ag(s).

Combine the half-equations so the electrons cancel: Ag+ + e− → Ag is doubled, giving Ni + 2Ag+ → Ni2+ + 2Ag.

Never multiply E⦵ values when you double a half-equation: they measure a tendency per electron, not an amount.

Fe3+/Fe2+ is +0.77 V and I2/I− is +0.54 V. For Fe3+ to be reduced and I− oxidised, E⦵cell = 0.77 − 0.54 = +0.23 V: feasible. 2Fe3+ + 2I− → 2Fe2+ + I2.

Br2/Br− is +1.09 V. For Fe3+ to oxidise Br−, E⦵cell = 0.77 − 1.09 = −0.32 V: not feasible. The reverse is: bromine oxidises Fe2+ to Fe3+.

Disproportionation

In disproportionation one species is both oxidised and reduced. Electrode potentials predict it: the species must appear on the left of one half-equation and the right of another with a less positive E⦵.

Ecell, entropy and the equilibrium constant

E⦵cell is directly proportional to the total entropy change, and to ln K, for the cell reaction:

\[ E^{\ominus}_{\text{cell}} \propto \Delta S_{\text{total}} \propto \ln K \]

So a positive E⦵cell means a positive ΔStotal and K greater than 1, and the larger E⦵cell is, the further the reaction goes towards completion.

Limitations of predictions from E⦵

Fuel cells

A fuel cell converts the energy of a fuel reacting with oxygen directly into electricity. Unlike an ordinary battery, the reactants are fed in continuously, so the voltage stays constant instead of falling as the reactants are used up.

Hydrogen–oxygen fuel cellAlkaline electrolyte (KOH)Acid electrolyte
negative electrode (H2 fed in)H2 + 2OH− → 2H2O + 2e− (E⦵ −0.83 V)H2 → 2H+ + 2e− (E⦵ 0.00 V)
positive electrode (O2 fed in)O2 + 2H2O + 4e− → 4OH− (E⦵ +0.40 V)O2 + 4H+ + 4e− → 2H2O (E⦵ +1.23 V)
overall2H2 + O2 → 2H2O, E⦵cell = +1.23 V either way

Redox titrations with potassium manganate(VII)

Acidified potassium manganate(VII) is a powerful oxidising agent that acts as its own indicator: purple MnO4− is reduced to almost colourless Mn2+. Put it in the burette; the end point is the first permanent pale pink colour, showing a tiny excess of MnO4−. Read the burette from the top of the meniscus, because the dark purple solution hides the bottom.

MnO4−(aq) + 8H+(aq) + 5Fe2+(aq) → Mn2+(aq) + 4H2O(l) + 5Fe3+(aq)

Use dilute sulfuric acid, in excess. Too little acid, or a weak acid such as ethanoic acid, cannot supply the 8H+ needed, and brown MnO2 forms instead, hiding the end point. Hydrochloric acid is unsuitable because MnO4− oxidises Cl− to chlorine (E⦵cell = 1.51 − 1.36 = +0.15 V), using up extra manganate(VII) and making a toxic gas. Nitric acid is unsuitable because it is an oxidising agent itself and would oxidise some of the Fe2+ (NO3−/HNO2 +0.94 V > Fe3+/Fe2+ +0.77 V), so too little manganate(VII) would be used.

2.80 g of iron tablets is dissolved in dilute sulfuric acid and made up to 250 cm3. 25.0 cm3 portions need 24.60 cm3 of 0.00500 mol dm−3 KMnO4. Find the percentage of iron by mass.

Moles of MnO4− = 0.02460 × 0.00500 = 1.23 × 10−4 mol.

The equation has 5 Fe2+ per MnO4−: moles of Fe2+ in 25.0 cm3 = 5 × 1.23 × 10−4 = 6.15 × 10−4 mol.

In the whole 250 cm3: 6.15 × 10−3 mol, so the mass of iron = 6.15 × 10−3 × 55.8 = 0.343 g.

Percentage of iron = 0.343 ÷ 2.80 × 100 = 12.3%.

Iodine–thiosulfate titrations

Iodine reacts quickly and completely with sodium thiosulfate, which is used to measure how much iodine a reaction has made:

I2(aq) + 2S2O32−(aq) → 2I−(aq) + S4O62−(aq)

This lets you find the amount of almost any oxidising agent: add it to excess potassium iodide, so it oxidises I− to I2, then titrate that iodine with standard thiosulfate.

Oxidising agentReaction with excess I−Overall ratio
copper(II) ions2Cu2+ + 4I− → 2CuI + I2 (white CuI precipitate)1 Cu2+ : 1 S2O32−
iodate(V) ions, acidifiedIO3− + 5I− + 6H+ → 3I2 + 3H2O1 IO3− : 6 S2O32−
chlorate(I) in bleach, acidifiedClO− + 2I− + 2H+ → I2 + Cl− + H2O1 ClO− : 2 S2O32−

1.50 g of brass is dissolved in nitric acid, neutralised and made up to 250 cm3. A 25.0 cm3 portion is added to excess KI, and the iodine released needs 15.70 cm3 of 0.100 mol dm−3 sodium thiosulfate. Find the percentage of copper.

Moles of S2O32− = 0.01570 × 0.100 = 1.57 × 10−3 mol.

2Cu2+ make 1 I2, which reacts with 2 S2O32−, so Cu2+ : S2O32− = 1 : 1. Moles of Cu2+ in 25.0 cm3 = 1.57 × 10−3 mol.

In 250 cm3: 1.57 × 10−2 mol, so mass of copper = 1.57 × 10−2 × 63.5 = 0.997 g.

Percentage of copper = 0.997 ÷ 1.50 × 100 = 66.5%.

Uncertainty in titrations

Quick checks

What is E⦵cell for Mg(s) | Mg2+(aq) || Cu2+(aq) | Cu(s)?

E⦵cell = Eright − Eleft = +0.34 − (−2.37) = +2.71 V. −2.03 V comes from adding the two values instead of subtracting; −2.71 V from subtracting the wrong way round.

Why is the salt bridge usually soaked in potassium nitrate rather than potassium chloride?

The salt bridge carries ions, not electrons, and its ions must not react with either half-cell.

Which statement about the standard hydrogen electrode is correct?

Its potential is defined as 0 V, not measured. The platinum black is an inert, conducting surface that catalyses the H2/H+ equilibrium.

Using the table, which species could oxidise Br− to Br2 under standard conditions?

The oxidising agent must have a more positive E⦵ than Br2/Br− (+1.09 V). Cl2/Cl− is +1.36 V, giving E⦵cell = +0.27 V; the others give negative values.

E⦵cell for a reaction is +0.45 V, but no reaction is seen. What is the best explanation?

A positive E⦵cell means the reaction is feasible and K > 1, but it says nothing about the rate.

Why is hydrochloric acid not used to acidify potassium manganate(VII) in titrations?

E⦵(MnO4−/Mn2+) = +1.51 V is more positive than E⦵(Cl2/Cl−) = +1.36 V, so the titre would be too large and toxic chlorine would form.

0.100 g of potassium iodate(V), KIO3 (Mr 214), is added to excess acidified KI. What volume of 0.100 mol dm−3 thiosulfate reacts with the iodine formed?

Moles of IO3− = 0.100 ÷ 214 = 4.67 × 10−4. Each makes 3I2, which need 6 S2O32−: 2.80 × 10−3 mol, which is 28.0 cm3. 14.0 cm3 forgets that each I2 needs two thiosulfate ions.

In an iodine–thiosulfate titration, when should the starch be added?

Added early, the starch–iodine complex forms in large amounts and does not release its iodine readily, giving an inaccurate end point.

Interactive diagrams

Build a cell from any two half-cells: the voltmeter shows Ecell = Eright − Eleft, the arrows show which way electrons flow, and the overall equation is balanced for you. Under More settings, move away from standard concentrations and watch the e.m.f. change.
Add thiosulfate to the iodine from the brass sample until it fades to pale yellow, then add the starch and stop when the blue-black colour goes. Try adding the starch too early to see why it should wait.